What Is the Name of a Movie Where George Peppard Lost His Memory and Is Agains the Major
" Thank's for the punch in the jaw, . . . . I deserved it, perhaps even a couple more "
There are not as well many spy films which can conjure upward a team of excellent actors for a picture show. This however is one. "The Groundstar Conspiracy" is a dramatic thriller of sorts, except that in this moving-picture show, the individual company is the target non the country. An explosion in a top secret installation causes a smashing deal of impairment and sets off an investigation to detect out who was behind the espionage. Enormous amount of destruction to exist certain, merely what the principal investigator (George Peppard) Tuxan wants to know is who is behind the sabotage. His but clue is in the course of a single survivor named John Welles (Michael Sarrazin) AKA Peter Bellamy, a homo who has no memory of what happened. This is an splendid vehicle for the Cat and Mouse game which follows. The survivor is having tremendous difficulty trying to remember who he is or was and Tuxan is allowing him to struggle while he watches out for any of his friends to come and help him recover. It's an excellent moving picture and one which gives the audience just enough information to follow the hero to the surprising ending. A good moving-picture show and 1 which is enhanced by Nicole Devon equally Christine Belford and Cliff Potts who plays Carl Mosely. ****
xix out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
the big bug
A super secret government space program laboratory known as Groundstar gets blown up while a woman, (Christine Belford) whose parents accept recently died and is also recently divorced tries to observe some solace for her shattered life in the summer business firm she was left in the will which just happens to exist in the directly vicinity of the in a higher place mentioned lab. The alone "survivor" of the explosion stumbles to her house with a disfigured face followed by regime security guru George Peppard and his crew who take him away to a high security hospital. Was he responsible for the explosion? The next fourth dimension we run into him, he turns out to exist Michael Sarrazin. And what follows is a moderately intriguing story that delves into some of and then, today's, and for all times big issues, such equally unchecked regime surveillance, brutal interrogation techniques, and brainwashing. The deft intermingling of personal elements with the regime security apparatus and some political and public relations angles makes for a fairly sophisticated and circuitous film.
22 out of 22 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sharp as a tack
This is the best Peppard performance. Is that maxim much? Probably not, but he's fairly mesmerizing equally an incredibly ruthless investigator whose superiors "just talk to God." Recall "Banacek" without ane shred of charm and you lot'll be near halfway there. The film shows its cheapjack Television pic origins in many ways, but the script is tight and the supporting cast (especially Belford doing a nice Rita Hayworth impression) is way in a higher place average. It's always been fashionable to hate Sarrazin, but today he'd be Keanu Reeves. Think about information technology.
24 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Skillful fiddling film
Lamont Johnson worked a lot in television just he as well directed some interesting films that should be better known; A Covenant with Decease, The McKenzie Pause, The Last American Hero, You'll Similar My Mother and Lipstick. (Even Spacehunter: Adventures in the Forbidden Zone has its felicities!) The Groundstar Conspiracy is a depression budget only fast moving thriller with a few twists and turns until the tense ending. All the elements of music, photography and dialogue are pulled together neatly to serve the narrative'due south momentum.
The plot may strain a little at the edges merely the motion-picture show is helped along by some skilful interim. Michael Sarrazin every bit the defendant man is convincing. You lot tin experience his terror and his bewilderment. Sarrazin's face helps, it looks crush about and haunted. George Peppard as the authorities homo gives one of his all-time performances. A real hard example, driven almost by paranoia, single minded and ready to do annihilation to keep the state secure. Christine Belford and Cliff Potts are good too. It'southward a practiced niggling picture show.
xx out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Clever, sharply made, well acted Thriller. One of my personal favourites. Rewatchability: Very Loftier DVD: Pretty sharp for a DVD (Anchor Bay, now OOP, but I have it : )
This is truly one of my all time favourites. I hadn't written a review of it until now because I had been concentrating on newer films, but I simply got through watching it over again with my Dad. I had nigh forgotten how awesome it was. I was VERY fortunate to score the Anchor Bay DVD only before it went OOP. Hard to believe that now information technology is going for over $seventy used, if y'all tin can find it.
Anyway, George Peppard has ever been 1 of the coolest guys, at to the lowest degree in his Pre-A Squad days, and peculiarly early (check out some of the Banacek episodes if y'all have a chance. The Pilot is especially good. And YES... I practice take both the Pilot and 2 seasons : )
Michael Sarrazin has always been pretty slick likewise, and he is adept here. But, it is primarily the swell story that Really makes this movie special. Also, I call up the managing director did a particularly good task in keeping the pace and action very tight and the mood suspenseful and involving. I personally feel that information technology was i of THE very best Thrillers fabricated effectually that fourth dimension. It is much amend than it'due south current rating of 6.x in my lowly and wretched opinion. I hands give information technology a stiff 'eight'
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED! (if you can ever get your hands on it : )
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A man without memory and identity as sole survivor of the destruction of a super classified inquiry institute and the sole bearer of its secrets
A super secret space research plant is blown up with all its half dozen responsible members of the squad, but i manages to get out of the inferno alive, although in that location is not much left of him, to the lowest degree of all a confront. The story of John Welles, played by Michael Sarrazin, is intriguing indeed, as he finds himself without identity and memory as he is returned to life by farthermost surgical efforts supervised by George Peppard equally the man in charge of the investigation of the disastrous sabotage. As Michael is the sole survivor and the only i left who could have known about the secrets of the establish and why it was blown up (for the purpose of selling its secrets abroad), George Peppard has every reason to be extremely concerned almost his example and bringing not simply the survivor back to life but likewise and above all his memory. This proves more or less impossible.
This is the beginning of the plot, which leads into an abyss of mysteries and thickening intrigue unto the very terminal moment, when everything clears. Information technology's an ingenious story, and although the environment of the film is dreadful, bunker prisons of mammoth overwhelmingness, it is even so highly recommendable, and there is Christine Belford to add some necessary softer touch to the dreadfulness and inhumanity, which unfortunately is the dominating chemical element of the pic; and when Michael finally gets even with George Peppard, even that infallible dictator must admit that he deserved information technology.
v out of v institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not That Bad
Simply re-saw The Groundstar Conspiracy afterwards some 20 something years. Ever been a big fan of both George Peppard and Micheal Sarrazin, so I was looking forward to this picture. Somewhat out-dated today, just for 1972, it wasn't all that bad. There are twists and turns. Plots and subplots. Action, suspense, drama, and fifty-fifty a lilliputian romance thrown in. Humor, at least a few lines, would of helped a lot here. At that place is a dainty surprise sort of ending. Clearly this is non a masterpiece of a cold state of war thriller similar The Spy Who Tin can In From The Cold or The Ipcress File, but The Goundstar Conspiracy is a nice little entertaining film. George Peppard looked groovy here and Micheal Sarrazin was in his prime. It's non their all-time roles, but if yous're a fan. it's a expert way to spend a rainy night.
sixteen out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very good!
Warning: Spoilers
This is the kind of motion picture that Hollywood doesn't normally produce. In Hollywood, in that location has to exist a articulate stardom between "proficient" and "evil" to win audiences and revenue. Unfortunately, this destroys a lot of pregnant films from being made. Groundstar Conspiracy was singular in that there was a definite blur between "good" and "evil". None more so than in the grapheme of Tuxan, played by the late George Peppard. Peppard plays a authorities operative who is maniacally obsessed with protecting national security. Yous like the guy at the kickoff, but when he starts interrogating "The Alien" - played by Michael Sarrazin (in the same year played in "Never Given In An Inch", and has a hitting resemblance to the vocalist BJ Thomas), you similar Tuxan much less. "The Alien" allegedly committed terrible espionage crimes, but cannot call up due to amnesia. You immediately empathize with "The Alien" as a guy who has to act tough, merely you can tell is a regular guy. The whole point of the film is that Tuxan is dead-assail capturing "The Alien" at all costs. The catastrophe has a strong moral message, and you have to decide whether y'all agree with what Tuxan does for a living or non. That is the strength of the motion picture - you have to decide upon morality for yourself (a powerful dilemma in America during the early 70s).
ten out of eleven found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
They shoot spies ,don't they?
Alarm: Spoilers
This is a flick as easy to picket equally to forget but it's quite entertaining.The story is very far-fetched,merely in this kind of spy thriller including amnesia ,mysterious conspiracies and who-the-Hell am I? discipline,it's the dominion of the game.George Peppard tries hard to be evil but he does not always succeed;Michael Sarrazin is the perfect victim/culprit (God merely knows) .The dear story may seem derivative and information technology is,but there are enough unexpected twists to sustain interest throughout.The working title ("the plastic homo" ) was maybe a ameliorate pick than "The Groundstar Conspiracy "but it might have been a spoiler.
vii out of nine found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Crafty thriller
Warning: Spoilers
Ruthless and computing government investigator Tuxon (superbly played to icy perfection past George Peppard) tries to effigy out who's exactly responsible for a break-in at a acme clandestine research facility. The sole lead Tuxon has is the enigmatic John David Welles (a fine performance by Michael Sarrazin), only the guy has amnesia and hence can't remember a matter.
Managing director Lamont Johnson relates the complex and gripping story at a abiding pace, maintains a tough no-nonsense tone throughout, generates a adept deal of tension, and stages a few heady action sequences with skill and flair. The smart script by Douglas Hayes not only neatly explores a pleasingly uneasy line in very contemptuous 70'south dread and paranoia, only too delivers ane doozy of a surprise twist at the end. The ace interim past the excellent cast rates as another substantial asset: Christine Belford as the sweet and helpful Nicole Devon, Cliff Potts as smooth press agent Carl Mosely, James Olson as the shifty Senator Stanton, Tim O'Connor equally the huffy Frank Gossage, James McEachin as the easygoing Bender, and Alan Oppenheimer every bit the hard-nosed Full general Hackett. Michael Reed'southward crisp widescreen cinematography provides an impressive polished await. Paul Hoffert'south dynamic groovy'north'jazzy score hits the stirring spot. An on the coin movie.
2 out of two found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Neat spy film
This is a cracking movie to scout especially if you love a expert, hard twist in the end. Just when you think you know what the truth is and who the evil bad guys are, the last v minutes takes yous in some other management you did not see coming. George Pappard's character's is fantastic as the government troubleshooter willing to go to any lengths to ferret out traitors and moles among tiptop secret government operations. There are a lot of dandy lines in the film too that helps the viewer to capeesh simply how much power the troubleshooter has to protect the country, and scary when you realize he really needs that much dominance to do the job. There is no style they could remake a better moving-picture show now unless they filled it with a lot of thrilling action scene or sex scenes. Even if they did, it would not match the psychological thrill of this original.
13 out of xvi plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"I would establish a bug in every bedroom in the country"
The Groundstar Conspiracy is your boilerplate spy thriller with George Peppard equally the ruthless investigator from an unnamed government agency and Michael Sarrazin as a scientist who is the simply survivor of a lab explosion at a top clandestine The states space plan called Groundstar. Peppard knows that Sarrazin is not who he says he is. But how did he get clearance in the identify, what may or may not accept been taken from the lab that the explosion covered upward are the questions Peppard has answers for. Because Sarrazin's memory has been wiped clean.
The key character in The Groundstar Conspiracy is Peppard equally a ruthless authorities investigator, a homo who could be J. Edgar Hoover if given one-half a chance. That championship phrase comes from Peppard's mouth who would similar to bug every bedroom in the country for security'due south sake, better to ferret out would exist subversives.
Of course Peppard plugs up his security leak, but Sarrazin, freedom, and Sarrazin's freedom pay a price.
The Groundstar Conspiracy has some interesting notions to put forth, simply the productions values are pretty skimpy. Christine Belford as a woman that Peppard's using to keep tabs on Sarrazin has her role very poorly defined. The players do their all-time, simply the film's general mediocrity weighs heavily on their piece of work.
5 out of ten found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
No-Star Mediocrity, The
When George Peppard is the major 'proper noun' of a flick – especially i made in the 70's – you may doubtable you lot're on dodgy ground from the off. When his co-stars are Michael Sarrazin – a ane-trick pony whose career spiralled downwards erstwhile around 1975 when the trick had been seen too many times – and Christine Belford – a cursory escapee from TV motion-picture show hell – you know it for a fact.
THE GROUNDSTAR CONSPIRACY is a far-fetched thriller with sci-fi undertones that moves far too slowly, telegraphs nearly of it's 'twists' far too early (apart from the big twist at the end, which, believe me, sends this sad effort way off the brownie meter) and suffers from some horribly clunky dialogue. Peradventure a manager at the very meridian of his game may accept been able to salvage something, but, unfortunately Lamont Johnson – another journeyman whose labours have more often than not been in television – was never that good a director. Peppard, as a tough, no-nonsense amanuensis, seems to be rehearsing his Hannibal part in THE A-Team without the sense of humor, while Sarrazin flashes puppy-canis familiaris eyes and tries to look puzzled. Lucky Christine Belford, so: her office calls for her to look bewildered much of the time, and, when she does, she looks completely natural.
Approach THE GROUNDSTAR CONSPIRACY as a mediocre B-flick, ignore its obvious – and woefully unrealised – ambitions, and you lot may just wring some drops of amusement from this old flannel.
14 out of forty establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Smashing unknown pic.
I saw this in its original run in a higher theatre. I take never been able to notice it anywhere. Frankly, I'thousand only glad to run across that it was remembered in imdb. If anybody tin can steer me toward a copy, please tell me. It was an contained precursor to Bourne earlier Bourne became an industry. Peppard is terrific. In fact, anybody is terrific.
viii out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
proficient spy thriller from the 1970's
Warning: Spoilers
A solitary young woman looking for peace and quiet decides to spend some time in her old weekend domicile. This is an unfortunate miscalculation, since the firm is located near a top secret authorities installation which blows upwardly in a giant explosion. Out of the rubble crawls and stumbles a badly wounded man. Bleeding profusely, he collapses in front end of the terrified adult female...
Aaah, the 1970's - a golden age for dystopian and/or paranoid tales about secrets, conspiracies, corruption of power and malfeasance. "The Groundstar Conspiracy" is certainly one of the ameliorate entries : information technology is a nicely compact and efficient spy thriller with an intelligent, twisty plot, skilful performances and well-chosen locations. At times the picture veers into a science fiction management, just in a good mode. (I didn't similar the musical score, but one tin't have everything.)
"Groundstar" contains interesting reflections on the disharmonize between country security and individual rights, such as the right to privacy. (Watch George Peppard as an investigator so relentless that he taps everything and annihilation tappable, including his own telephone.) There is likewise food for thought on the themes of retention and identity. What is information technology that defines us humans as individuals - our faces, our names, our pasts ? Our beliefs ? Suppose, for example, that you had a terrible accident and that doctors had to provide you lot with a more than or less workable face - non a beautiful face nor an ugly one, just an boilerplate face up different from your own. Would you even so recognize yourself ? Would your life veer into an entirely new direction ? Or suppose that you lot've suffered a bad accident, only that doctors succeed in duplicating your old face, downwardly to the tiniest wrinkle. Is it possible that you lot would not recognize the face - or yourself ?
Do sentry "Groundstar", information technology'southward well worth your time.
1 out of 1 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Might have been amend with Elliot Ness chasing Dr. Richard Kimble
This film originally had the more evocative title "The Conflicting". David Janssen was to play the title role with Robert Stack in the George Peppard part.
Talented Douglas Heyes ("Kitten With a Whip", "Captains and Kings", "Aspen"), who wrote the screenplay, was prepare to direct. David Levinson (the Emmy winning Hal Holbrook series "The Senator") was going to produce.
Genevieve Bujold was originally set up to play the Christine Belford role. But, for some unknown reason, Genevieve quit just before product was to starting time. This delayed the outset of filming, and Janssen had to get out since the film was already scheduled to finish just days before he would start his Jack Webb series "O'Hara, United states of america Treasury".
Apparently they couldn't find an actress hungry or brave enough to come in immediately and replace Bujold. I might accept tried to get Sharon Acker, Diana Muldaur, Gena Rowlands, Salome Jens or Rosemary Forsyth to just jump in and do their best.
I remember David Janssen could accept given the story a more mysterious, magnetic core than Michael Sarrazin did, and Janssen would accept had interesting chemistry with any of those five women.
I also recollect Peter Falk (who was starting "Columbo" the side by side flavour) could have been even improve than Stack or Peppard as the tough-as-nails investigator.
Steven Spielberg and John Badham were hot Universal Television directors at the time. This might accept been an interesting showtime film for either of those young Turks.
7 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Suspense,but....
...with stunning views of 70's Vancouver beaches,mountains and architecture, this drama has great actors with a suspenseful plot,withal kind of slow. Still a nostalgia treat to sentinel that is family friendly.
3 out of 4 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hard To Follow...
For some reason I similar this movie, and watched information technology a few times. But information technology seems the more than I watch it, the more than confused I become? And difficult not to give a ton of spoilers in doing so. But as a motion picture to how bad can invasion of privacy and monitoring by the American government can get, I'd say this was well ahead of its fourth dimension! Peppard is overly cocky and confident every bit the chief investigator to this mass explosion that destroys a hole-and-corner hugger-mugger lab most a wilderness customs among the Rockies. He seems the 1 to 'police the police', and is unrelenting in letting other officials and authorities stick their nose into his investigation. The lonely survivor believed to exist the saboteur appears at this adult female's cottage(?) desperately injured with his face up burned off. He's taken to an elaborate facility and stitched back together (revealing Sarrazin) Merely he can't remember anything? He'south constantly grilled why he went to that woman's place later the explosion, and is she a conspirator also? He honestly doesn't know, other than he was looking for assist. And why would she call the police force on him then? Peppard is nonetheless leery of the two, and lets Sarrazin call up he's escaped afterwards a hospital transfer gets thwarted. Sarrazin makes his style secretly back to the woman'due south house knowing she's under surveillance still. But convinces her to hear him out that he's totally amnesiac and doesn't believe he is in any way part of a conspiracy to destroy this secret base of operations. She believes him, and takes compassion on him to aid regain some of his retentivity, all while trying to seemingly elude Peppard and his recapture of Sarrazin. The 'whos' and 'whys' and 'whats' get-go to get pretty muddled as to the purpose of this base, who was going to do good from its secrets, and who immune such a rouge element into the project to begin with? Then again, without giving spoilers away, the movie veers onto all these different courses, and Saarazin and the woman may not exist such a threat after all? But the chilling part is in how they were used in the whole scheme of things. Rightfully or wrongly? That'due south the chilling, and somewhat difficult to accept ending to it all. Cartel I compare information technology to Paul Bartel's nutty 'Not For Publication' movie - but it nearly follows the same threads. Offense, conspiracy, and political righteousness all become tangled up in this ball of wax. And past the terminate when you recall there'due south going to be some hardcore justice and the 'good guys win' it doesn't exactly plow out that fashion. In that location's resolve - only is it truly upstanding? I'd say both movies have expert intent, weave an intriguing mystery, just gets lost in its cloak & dagger business past getting overly complex and non-explanatory, or just downright silly and hard to believe. Yet as we all know well now, fact can usually be stranger than fiction. Is 'justice' and true closure Ever needed?
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Groovy lesser known film.
Alert: Spoilers
I saw this when it offset came out. I was surprised. The story kept y'all guessing. The cast was well rounded. It was nice to come across Michael Sarazin. It is difficult to detect his films. The ending volition surprise yous. I love the set because it is an actual location not a prepare.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Silly plot, great retro-seventies decor
Homme 21 September 1998
This film isn't really interesting in itself: the plot is far-fetched, the characters are wooden and the action scenes probably would have been considered dull even when the moving picture was fabricated. Even so a very interesting picture for anyone interested in early-seventies interiors, mode, hairstyles, etc.: for me, being thirty-something, it was a feast of recognition :-)
P.S. Don't forget to mind to the soundtrack.
5 out of twenty found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Peppard's Potency
Peppard is in charge in this one. Information technology's strange. If you scout his flicks you'll see a mutual theme of friction between Pepe & Potency. If they're non holding him back, they're plotting his downfall. It's Funny to run into the person Peppard becomes with that kind of power. Terminal fourth dimension Pepe was the boss was in the Carpetbaggers. There's a reason he'southward not in charge too often.
1 out of two found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Adept Thanksgiving Fare (it's a real turkey)
A top-underground government lab blows up, one saboteur (Michael Sarrazin)survives and a super-abrasive, super-tough authorities super-agent reins Sarrazin in and then reels him out like a super-fisherman playing with his catch. All the "suspense" in this movie comes from the fact that Sarrazin can't remember the hole-and-corner data that'south supposedly locked upwardly in his brain and tin can't even recall who he is working for, while super-agent George Peppard spends nearly the entire film trying to get Sarrazin to cough up said data. Other than the weak and unconvincing interplay betwixt the ii principals and Sarrazin's dallying with a lone widow, there is simply nothing happening in this pic. The "action scenes" are about as exciting as watching someone mow a lawn and the large "twist" ending makes little or no sense. The author of all this nonsense must call back that having a secret lab accident up, having the blower-up exist an amnesiac and having the accident-ees go crispy critters is very exciting, but alas it's non. He doesn't seem to understand that characters demand to be more than one-dimensional and stories - even sci-fi thrillers - need to be interesting as well equally plausible.
2 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068663/reviews
0 Response to "What Is the Name of a Movie Where George Peppard Lost His Memory and Is Agains the Major"
إرسال تعليق